The internship program, as noted above, is a key part of NEWPATH; and
your evaluation will play an essential role in improving the program over
time. Please be assured that your evaluation of the NEWPATH
student you are supervising
will be treated as completely confidential and will be
available only
to the student's faculty advisors and to the NEWPATH team. In particular,
it will not be available to the student being evaluated,
although the information will be of great value to the student's
advisors in identifying and recommending, to the student, specific
courses to take or other activities to participate in, in order to
address important weaknesses in the student's abilities. We realize
that your time is valuable and sincerely thank you for taking the time
and effort to complete this evaluation.
|
| Level: Marginal
| Level: Satisfactory
| Level: Proficient
| Level: Distinguished
| Actual level of
Achievement
| Degree of Importance
|
| Technical Knowledge and Skills:
|
Understanding of essential computing principles and ability to
apply them in practice
|
Basic understanding of some main principles of computing;
rarely sees their relation to practice;
|
Reasonable understanding of most key computing principles and, with
some guidance, often sees applicability to practical
problems and situations;
|
Good understanding of all important computing principles;
almost always able to see their applicability to practical problems
and situations;
|
Thorough understanding of important computing principles;
able to carefully analyze the extent of their applicability to
practical problems; often able to come up with novel ways to tweak
given situations to enable applicability of standard computing
techniques.
|
|
|
Knowledge of, and facility with, standard programming systems and tools
|
Minimal familiarity with a few languages and tools;
needs much more exposure to a range of modern systems and tools;
|
Reasonable familiarity with a number of common tools and languages;
needs guidance in choosing the best tools for specific
situations;
|
Good familiarity and experience with a range of tools and languages;
usually able to choose the most appropriate tools for specific
applications;
|
Wide experience with, and deep understanding of, a wide range of
tools and
languages; not only able to choose the most appropriate tool for specific
situations but also able to combine various tools in novel ways to
address unusual needs.
|
|
|
Knowledge of key business principles and practices
|
Minimal knowledge of business practices;
no intuition for what is important from a business point of view
vs. what is not;
|
Some knowledge of business processes and practices; often needs guidance
in understanding what is important and what is not;
|
Good understanding of business processes and practices; is usually able to
focus on key problems and identify solutions appropriate to the
business's needs;
|
Keen, intuitive grasp of business problems and how to address them; not only
finds solutions to problems faced by the business but is often able to
identify new business opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
| Professional Skills:
|
Teamworking skills
|
Loner with poor team skills; often misses team meetings and, when present,
often does not listen to alternative viewpoints,
occasionally engages in "put-downs" and personal attacks;
|
Some team skills; when others make an effort to work with
him, works reasonably well with them;
|
Good team skills;
makes a definite effort to understand others' ideas; works well with
other team members to find solutions to common problems.
|
Born team-player and team-leader; not only helps team develop
solutions to a range of problems, but also gets buy-in from all members
of the team and helps team members develop a sense of team loyalty.
|
|
|
Communication skills
|
Poor oral and written skills; poor organization of presentations with
unclear main points and conclusions; does not seem aware of audience
reactions; poor contribution during team presentations, discussions;
|
Somewhat developed oral and written skills; presentations reasonably
organized but not always effective; written documents are adequate but
reader has to struggle to keep reading; positive contributions during
team presentations, discussions;
|
Good oral and written skills; well organized presentations and written
documents; very good contributions to team presentations, discussions;
|
Superb presentations and written documents; creative slides and
compelling writing style; keeps the audience/reader engaged throughout;
helps team members during their presentations and greatly contributes to
effectiveness of team discussions.
|
|
|
Networking skills
|
Poor networking skills; has a hard time in informal settings; finds it
difficult to talk about his own projects or getting others to talk
about their interests;
|
Moderate networking skills; is usually quiet in informal settings but
if the other side draws him out, is able to talk convincingly about
his projects;
|
Good networking skills; able to talk comfortably to technical and
non-technical people and explain his ideas; shows interests in others
ideas and points of view;
|
Superb networking skills; able to talk enthusiastically to nearly
everyone from CEOs to engineers and salespeople and gets them
interested in his projects; is able to move conversation in the
direction he wants to take it.
|
|
|
Knowledge of ethical issues
|
Little or no understanding of ethical or professional issues even where
there are serious questions involved;
|
Some understanding of professional and ethical issues raised
directly by particular business decisions; when the connection
is not immediate or direct, needs help in seeing the issues;
|
Good understanding of all important professional and ethical issues
related to various business practices and decisions.
|
Deep understanding of professional issues involved and the ethical
implications of particular business decisions; pays careful consideration
to implications to society as a whole of business decisions and
practices.
|
|
|
Lifelong learning (LLL) skills
|
Poor LLL skills; when researching a problem or technology,
collects only minimal information; analysis of the information tends
to just restate it;
|
Some LLL skills; when researching, tends to be too focused
on the given problem, ignoring potentially important related issues;
some analysis of collected information but somewhat shallow;
|
Reasonable LLL skills; competent at gathering all relevant information
and analyzing it;
|
Excellent LLL skills; excellent research skills, often finding
relevant information in unusual places; detailed analysis of information
with well supported conclusions.
|
|
|
|
|
| Entrepreneurial Skills:
|
Ability to innovate
|
Very limited; usually thinks in terms of small and incremental
changes both in functionality and marketability;
|
Some ability to innovate; occasionally thinks outside the box, but often
needs a bit of a push in the right direction;
|
Good ability to innovate; often comes up with novel ways to solve
problems or to use existing tools and systems for unusual purposes;
|
Bubbling with novel new ideas and ways of applying existing ideas
and products; often they don't pan out but doesn't let that discourage
him;
|
|
|
Ability to see opportunities and understand market forces
|
Not a market-oriented person; focuses on technology issues with no
regard for what will sell;
|
Some theoretical understanding of market forces; often needs help in
applying the theory to real markets;
|
Good understanding of market forces; good appreciation of essential
factors that will determine success or failure of a new product;
|
Sees opportunities where others see only problems -
the proverbial "lemonade maker"! If anyone is likely to make
it as an entrepreneur, this is the one!
|
|
|
Ability to sell ideas to VCs and others
|
Poor sales skills; often doesn't see how to present ideas in a
manner tailored to the listener; as a result, even his likely-to- succeed
ideas tend to get overlooked;
|
Some ability to present his ideas especially to sympathetic audiences and
with advance preparation;
|
Good ability to present a strong business case; is usually able to think
on his feet and address any concerns or questions that VCs and others
bring up;
|
Born salesman! Can persuade the most skeptical people to seriously
consider investing in his vision.
|
|
|